Question: Policy on requests for information on suspensions
Tellahane wrote: So I ask of you Kyrin, do you feel guilt? do you have a desire to correct wrongs? you went from one offense, apologized for it, and turned around and with a lack of tact, crapped all over it essentially.
Do I feel guilt for posting a meme? No I don't. That is because you and I have a difference of opinion in what those posts mean. And quite frankly for you to try and tell me what neaj may feel after you have already told me I don't get to do that reduces your argument to nonsense.
But do I feel guilt for hurting feelings over a misunderstanding. Yes I do and I have conveyed that already.
However these two things are mutually exclusive. You however may not think so and that is fine, but you dont get to tell me what I feel.
Now back the the core of the issue here. Compromise under mutual cooperation and negotiation. I am willing to accept that idea that the posts were perceived to be done with a lack of respect to the thread and in that vein I will apologize to anyone that was offended by my posts. This is not guilt for the posting but guilt that I unintentionally offended anyone. And because of that guilt I am willing to negotiate a settlement to the matter in compromise by splitting the posts off and leaving the original thread unlocked.
Now what I am asking for from you is the same sort of concession. The concession that you were perceived as being incourteous in your dealings with us. I'm not asking that you feel guilty for the action, but guilty for offending us with your action. And in that light be willing to admit that action was perceived as offensive and then come to a compromise to agree on a solution we can all find acceptable.
This is the basis of good communication, right?
This guns for hire, even if we're just dancing in the dark.
My Journals: Kyrin-Wyldstar
Associate Degree of Divinity - Earned July, 2017
Apprenticed to: Alan, Senan, Mendalicious
Tribute to Senan: My Friend
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Tellahane wrote: I never told you what to feel, I simply asked if you did. This is not a negotiation, I am a Knight of this temple, and the system administrator, it is my duty to look after and protect it and the membership within. You are a guest of this temple, when you commit offenses against it I will respond accordingly, and I feel that the 24hr lock was and still is the most appropriate action. From the moment I locked it I had already planned at the time of unlocking to split the thread, but not before. You are of course as I have said before, welcome to appeal to council who outranks me. I have to comply with their requests, but until such time I shall continue my duties as I have sworn to do. You may not like the manner of which your consequences for your actions came to you, but your not meant to.
It's not a matter of liking it or not. You still seem to be misunderstanding my intention here. You can run this place any way you like. I'm just trying to point out to you a potentially better way to do it.
Im rather disappointed that at this point you have chosen to take this sort of dictatorial stance and "lay down the law" to me. It serves no purpose other than to polarize the party you are addressing further against your position.
My opinion is this is not the way a knight should conduct themselves when approached with openness and honesty. That's all I'm trying to do here. It's sad that this has become the norm since jestors leaving.
It's pretty obvious my words have fallen on deaf ears so I'm done. Best of luck.
This guns for hire, even if we're just dancing in the dark.
My Journals: Kyrin-Wyldstar
Associate Degree of Divinity - Earned July, 2017
Apprenticed to: Alan, Senan, Mendalicious
Tribute to Senan: My Friend
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Kobos wrote: Would you have responded to any other form of plea? I must admit I at times would not respond to a less forceful move.
The plea I was responding to was the last one tella made here where he told me "he was a knight" and "I was just a guest". Those statements alone stink of self entitlement to begin with. Beyond that he basically told me he would not consider my compromise or entertain any suggestion from me concerning the security operations of this place.
It's fine with me. However I would have loved it if tella would have stepped up and actually had a conversation with me as peers and not from his high horse and we could have come to some sort of mutually agreed upon understanding. That was my goal and I think the fact that I could not further this conversation to that point was a direct result of my reputation here. People have this idea I'm always scheming and manipulating. This is not true but I understand why people think that. But in this case I was just trying to help.
And even though I'm supposed to be of such low character does it make it right when I get treated back with that same low character or are knights supposed to be better? I don't know, but what do you honestly think about my suggestion as someone who is a member here and has a vested interest in how it is operated?
This guns for hire, even if we're just dancing in the dark.
My Journals: Kyrin-Wyldstar
Associate Degree of Divinity - Earned July, 2017
Apprenticed to: Alan, Senan, Mendalicious
Tribute to Senan: My Friend
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Forum
-
TOTJO Forum
-
Temple
-
Temple Security
- Question: Policy on requests for information on suspensions
